首页 > 中学考试杂题 > 题目详情
雅思作文 Topic:Some experts believe that it is better for childr
题目内容:
雅思作文
Topic:Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
We used to impart a foreign language to children when they attend a secondary school.Presently,a prevalent new view point is that
there are a number of positive outcomes if a student start to learn a foreigh language from primary school.
The drawbacks of studying a second language early are multifarious.To start with,an elementary school student should be given more freedom,that is to say,studying a language might become a significant burden of him or her.As a consequence,a variety of negative
atitude(i.e.afraid of attending school and even get bored of everyting) could be triggered due to the situation.Moreover,primary
school teachers are rarely obtained a special trainnig for teaching a language,so that they are probably not professional and their
student might be misled and get wrong knowledge.
However,the idea has also gainned numerous advocates,for the sake of the following reasons.To learn a language from childhood is more rational according to several science researches.More specifically,children who were impart a language at primary schools could more likely to accept it when comparied with those study at secondary schools.Additionally,studying a language is a long-term
objective which needs us to devote ourselves into it for dozens of years.Which means,the earlier we learn it,the more skilled
language we will have.
All in all,I hold the opinion that the children are spposed to learn a foreign language from attending primary school.Admittedly there are
plenty of pros and cons for this issue,I believe the former prevails over the latter.As a college student,I totally understand the
importance of a foreign language,especially take the trend of globalization into consideration
雅思作文
Topic:Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
We used to impart a foreign language to children when they attend a secondary school.Presently,a prevalent new view point is that
there are a number of positive outcomes if a student start to learn a foreigh language from primary school.
The drawbacks of studying a second language early are multifarious.To start with,an elementary school student should be given more freedom,that is to say,studying a language might become a significant burden of him or her.As a consequence,a variety of negative
atitude(i.e.afraid of attending school and even get bored of everyting) could be triggered due to the situation.Moreover,primary
school teachers are rarely obtained a special trainnig for teaching a language,so that they are probably not professional and their
student might be misled and get wrong knowledge.
However,the idea has also gainned numerous advocates,for the sake of the following reasons.To learn a language from childhood is more rational according to several science researches.More specifically,children who were impart a language at primary schools could more likely to accept it when comparied with those study at secondary schools.Additionally,studying a language is a long-term
objective which needs us to devote ourselves into it for dozens of years.Which means,the earlier we learn it,the more skilled
language we will have.
All in all,I hold the opinion that the children are spposed to learn a foreign language from attending primary school.Admittedly there are
plenty of pros and cons for this issue,I believe the former prevails over the latter.As a college student,I totally understand the
importance of a foreign language,especially take the trend of globalization into consideration
Topic:Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
We used to impart a foreign language to children when they attend a secondary school.Presently,a prevalent new view point is that
there are a number of positive outcomes if a student start to learn a foreigh language from primary school.
The drawbacks of studying a second language early are multifarious.To start with,an elementary school student should be given more freedom,that is to say,studying a language might become a significant burden of him or her.As a consequence,a variety of negative
atitude(i.e.afraid of attending school and even get bored of everyting) could be triggered due to the situation.Moreover,primary
school teachers are rarely obtained a special trainnig for teaching a language,so that they are probably not professional and their
student might be misled and get wrong knowledge.
However,the idea has also gainned numerous advocates,for the sake of the following reasons.To learn a language from childhood is more rational according to several science researches.More specifically,children who were impart a language at primary schools could more likely to accept it when comparied with those study at secondary schools.Additionally,studying a language is a long-term
objective which needs us to devote ourselves into it for dozens of years.Which means,the earlier we learn it,the more skilled
language we will have.
All in all,I hold the opinion that the children are spposed to learn a foreign language from attending primary school.Admittedly there are
plenty of pros and cons for this issue,I believe the former prevails over the latter.As a college student,I totally understand the
importance of a foreign language,especially take the trend of globalization into consideration
本题链接: